menu close

18th January 2019

Right-sizing for Safety Database Implementation

Post by Tom Dredge, Senior PV Analyst.

pharmasol recently sponsored a leading industry conference where, amongst other excellent presentations, a discussion around Right-size PV really stood out.

The essence of the presentation was that when implementing a PV System in a new country or region, it must align with the capabilities of the overarching authorities otherwise there is a real risk that both the implementation and the ongoing activities will fail.  So where, say, the EMA GVP might be seen as the Gold Standard, it may not be fully compatible with the available resources and competencies of that country or region.

Bottom line: You don’t always need a sledgehammer to crack a nut

 

But what if the Gold Standard is the only standard?

Now, in contrast to the establishment of a brand new set of regulations in a region or country – where beyond the guiding principles and generally accepted practices they are free to implement regulations as they wish – the implementation of computerized systems in the pharmaceutical industry, especially ones that support high-risk business processes such as a safety database, must align with robust and stringent guidelines and regulations already established by the various health authorities and regulatory agencies.

In addition, in order that the computerized system is fit-for-purpose in a global environment now and for the future, it must be compliant with the regulations in the largest markets.  Therefore, it is important that the expectations of the FDA and EMA (and MHLW where appropriate) are met, especially as many other authorities and agencies use these regulations as a basis for their own.

Bottom line:  The sledgehammer is always necessary when your nut is a PV Safety Database

 

So, how can we “Right-size” the safety database implementation?

Right-sizing is not necessarily concerned only with reducing the overall effort.

Right-sizing computerized system implementation is primarily driven by the make-up of the organization in question.

Let’s explore this further….

A typical project to implement or upgrade an on-premise safety database requires dedicated resources from across your organization, including PV; Business QA; IT QA; IT Engineering; IT Infrastructure; IT PM; and more.

The ongoing maintenance and updates will then require some or all of that resource over the life cycle of the system.  In addition, technology infrastructure (e.g. hardware) and physical infrastructure (e.g. a data centre) are required to deliver the system.  And of course, all of the activities must be validated and controlled.

The traditional project implementation model.  Looks pretty on paper – but in reality, it introduces operational risk to the organization.

 

That is a lot of resource, time and financial commitment by anyone’s standards and can expose your organization to both financial risk (that may be unnerving, especially if the system is initially underutilised) and operational risk (by taking expert resources away from their core business roles for long periods of time).

Back to the question of “How can we Right-size the safety database implementation?”

The most practical, scalable and efficient way to Right-size the implementation of a safety database is to lessen the impact and risk to your organization.There are two main areas where that can be achieved:

Utilizing industry experts reduces operational risk for the implementation by allowing operation staff to continue to focus on their “day job”.

 

On-premise installation requires hardware, data centre and resources to manage it all.

 

Off-premise solution providing services on demand.

Bottom line:  You can lessen the impact of the sledgehammer by utilizing external resources 

 

That’s fine for the implementation project, but what about the maintenance phase?

Once a safety database is delivered (hopefully quicker, cheaper and better by utilizing industry experts), how can your organization continue to benefit from Right-sizing the maintenance effort?

The Maintenance Phase of a system is the major part of a system life-cycle.  It’s the reason the system was implemented in the first place.  It’s where it is used and upgraded and (sometimes) broken (and then fixed).

Traditionally, this part is executed by the business; Data Processing, Medical Review, Regulatory Reporting, etc.  This generally forms the major part of the day-to-day activities for the PV organization.However, in order for the system to support the business, there is usually an administrative aspect; User Management, Study Set-up, Codelist Maintenance, etc.  This business support function is generally very specialized – fitting into neither the IT nor PV areas.  Consequently, safety database administrators tend to be hard to find and expensive to employ.  In addition, in many small to medium sized companies, the administrator may either not have enough tasks to fill their day and/or have no back-up when they are absent or unavailable once again exposing the organization to undue financial and operational risk.

Having the System Administrator in your organization maybe they are an underutilised resource.

 

Right-sizing the administrative aspects of the safety database can be done in the same way as the implementation project; by lessening the impact to the organization.

We call this Right-sourcing – meaning to partner with an organization that already has fully trained and experienced staff for completing such tasks.  This can be tailored across a number of models, including retainer and pay-as-you-go strategies, to establish a fully trained, fully available administrative partner that reduces the operational and financial risks.

Right-sourcing to a vendor who provides an on-demand support service means you only pay for what you get.

 

 

Bottom line: You can continue to lessen the impact of the sledgehammer by Right-sourcing

In Summary

A significant proportion of the overall risk associated with the implementation and maintenance of a safety database comes from the resource and infrastructure requirements.

Right-sizing the project by engaging with industry experts in technology, validation and processes can improve quality, speed of delivery and efficiency in the delivery of the project, and lower training, infrastructure and resource costs throughout the life cycle of the system.Finding a vendor who can dove-tail into your organization and provide a bespoke solution can be the key success factor in your safety database system implementation project.

 

pharmasol

pharmasol has developed rapidLIVE Argus and rapidLIVE Argus SaaS alongside their Expertise-as-a-Service/Right-Source and Consulting services to provide a Right-size offering for organizations looking to benefit from the market leading functionality of Oracle Argus Safety at a resource, quality, time and price point that supports a go-live that is as quick and as smooth as possible.

Tom Dredge is a computerized system validation and Argus professional who has worked in the Pharmaceutical Industry for 19 years.

News and events

pharmasol News: Summer 2022

19th July 2022

Find out more chevron_right

WEBINAR: rapidLIVE and Oracle Argus – fast-track to the gold standard PV database for life science SMEs

17th May 2022

Find out more chevron_right

RapidLIVE transforms case processing efficiency for award-winning PV service provider IntuVigilance

8th April 2022

Find out more chevron_right

Newsletter – Spring 2022

29th March 2022

Find out more chevron_right

Juggling the regulatory complexities of global clinical trials (pharmamanufacturing.com)

23rd February 2022

Find out more chevron_right

pharmasol completes merger with PharmaLex Group

2nd February 2022

Find out more chevron_right

Automating safety processes can benefit DCTs: Pharmasol (outsourcing-pharma.com)

1st December 2021

Find out more chevron_right

Pharmacovigilance: Improving Public Health – Contract Pharma

23rd November 2021

Find out more chevron_right

pharmasol Launches New psiXchange Capabilities to Enhance Delivery of Clinical Trial Safety Documentation

1st June 2021

Find out more chevron_right

From Signature to Go-live in 6 weeks

10th July 2020

Find out more chevron_right

pharmasol Achieves ISO 27001 Certification

21st April 2020

Find out more chevron_right

Using Third Parties in Business Continuity Plans

6th April 2020

Find out more chevron_right

Business as Usual (at This Unusual Time)

19th March 2020

Find out more chevron_right

Oracle introduced Flexible Code Lists as part of the Argus 8 release

5th February 2020

Find out more chevron_right

New whitepaper – Iterative implementation approach

20th September 2019

Find out more chevron_right

Clarification regarding “Pharmasol Corporation”

1st July 2019

Find out more chevron_right

What’s the most powerful phrase in System Implementation? Why?

22nd May 2019

Find out more chevron_right

Another hosted Argus customer live in record time

8th February 2019

Find out more chevron_right

Right-sizing for Safety Database Implementation

18th January 2019

Find out more chevron_right

How psiXchange and CTM can make your safety reporting life easier!

7th December 2018

Find out more chevron_right

12 months of success for the Argus team

22nd May 2018

Find out more chevron_right

How automation is uncovering hidden insights

30th April 2018

Find out more chevron_right

Coding Of Clinical Data In A World After dsNavigator

18th April 2018

Find out more chevron_right

Release update – March 2018 – Important information for existing customers.

8th March 2018

Find out more chevron_right

What’s a smart portal?

29th January 2018

Find out more chevron_right

APEX success

27th October 2017

Find out more chevron_right

New Strategic psiXchange Deployment with Leading CRO

16th November 2016

Find out more chevron_right

pharmasol Launches Update to Business Process Automation System

16th February 2016

Find out more chevron_right

Investigators’ Experience With Expedited Safety Reports

10th September 2014

Find out more chevron_right